TMX-2172

TMX-2172 : Degrader (PROTAC) of CDK2, CDK5

Structure

Information

  • CDK2
  • CDK5
  • Degrader (PROTAC)
  • 250 nM

In Vitro Validations

Uniprot ID: P24941
Target Class: Kinase
Target SubClass: CMGC
Potency: IC50
Potency Value: 6.5 nM
Potency Assay: CDK2/cyclin A binding assay
PDB ID for probe-target interaction (3D structure): --
Target aliases:
Cyclin-dependent kinase 2, CDKN2, CDK2, CDK2_HUMAN ...

DOI Reference: 10.1002/anie.202004087

In Cell Validations

In Vivo Data

No in Vivo Validations

Off-Target Selectivity Assesments

Off Target: AURKA
Potency end-point : IC50 205 nM
Potency assay (off target): TMX-2172 was screened in KINOMEscan, which profiles more than 400 kinases.14 kinases exhibited >99 % inhibition by 1 μm TMX-2172 compared to DMSO. CDK2 was the only CDK that showed potent inhibition (CDK1 is not included in KINOMEscan panel). SILAC quantitative mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomic method was used to determine the range of targets degraded by TMX-2172 in OVCAR8 cells, a HGSOC cell line after 6h treatment at 250 nM. Three kinases CDK2, CDK5, and Aurora A, the top hits from KINOMEscan, were found to be effectively degraded, while the degree of degradation of the other three kinases RSK1 (RPS6KA1), JNK2 (MAPK9), and STK33 was relatively weak.
I have extra information to add

SERP ratings and comments


SERP Ratings

In Cell Rating

SERP Comments:

TMX-2172 demonstrated potent degradation activity for CDK2 in some cell lines, but it also induced degradation of other proteins, such as CDK5 and AURKA. Additionally, the authors did not mention whether the degradation of ZNF692 would have a synergistic effect on cell growth inhibitory activity. Data on the cell growth inhibitory activity of the co-treatment with the appropriate CDK2 ligand part of TMX-2172 and PEG-linked pomalidomide would be needed to confirm the effect. Another important point to mention is that TMX-2172 should be used cautiously in other cell lines because the degradation effects on CDK5 and AURKA are not clear in these lines.

(last updated: 15 Jun 2024 )

SERP Ratings

In Cell Rating

SERP Comments:

While selectivity was shown for this probe in OVCAR8 cells (5 µM for 6 h) as well as Jurkat cells (10 µM for 6 h), more extensive cell profiling, including lines and time points, could have been performed to show broad selectivity. A common cell line used in degrader work is the HEK-293 cell line. 10 µM treatment here for both 6 h as well as longer timepoints would have been worthwhile to show, as well as a comparison of CRBN levels across these 3 lines. To claim selectivity, a much broader panel of lines with comparable and high CRBN levels should be shown. Generally, another negative control via appending a structurally similar but non-binding CDK2 ligand (eg, removing an element of the hinge binding motif) is also important for PROTAC controls.

(last updated: 28 Aug 2024 )

SERP+ Ratings

In Cell Rating

SERP+ Comments:

Including additional time points after treatment would be beneficial.

(last updated: 31 Oct 2024 )